I disagree. You can also make the argument that sapient creatures (those with human intelligence) don't count as zoophilia inherently, because it eliminates the problem of consent, leaving only the (somewhat poor) argument that it's just "unnatural". The reason I say that's a poor argument is because it isn't an argument in and of itself, and really, who even gets to decide what is and isn't "natural"? After all, the next smartest creature after humans, dolphins, have literally raped humans before and often pleasure themselves with fish(sorry for making you picture that). Then again, this is more of a rebuttal to the argument for the inherent immorality of this video, and less of an argument for it not being deemed zoophilia. Sorry for yap, I'm a recovering redditor 🤮
I disagree. You can also make the argument that sapient creatures (those with human intelligence) don't count as zoophilia inherently, because it eliminates the problem of consent, leaving only the (somewhat poor) argument that it's just "unnatural". The reason I say that's a poor argument is because it isn't an argument in and of itself, and really, who even gets to decide what is and isn't "natural"? After all, the next smartest creature after humans, dolphins, have literally raped humans before and often pleasure themselves with fish(sorry for making you picture that). Then again, this is more of a rebuttal to the argument for the inherent immorality of this video, and less of an argument for it not being deemed zoophilia. Sorry for yap, I'm a recovering redditor 🤮