When you look at cartoon porn are you jerking off to people or the idea of people? Cartoons aren't human and are therefore incapable of relationships, is it possible for there to be cartoon incest porn or is it all in your head?
- 5574 views
You are here
Philosophy
Sat, 31/01/2026 - 18:39
#1
Add new comment
Sat, 12/09/2026 - 14:36
#5
If you’re not gonna be your biggest er, who will? If everyone around you is telling you you’re great but you don’t believe it, it all means nothing. But if you believe you’re great, nothing anyone tells you will matter.
be like Kanye
Sat, 12/09/2026 - 03:28
#7
As a previous girlfriend once told me If you’re truly serious about something and you mean it instead of thinking with your dick tug one out wait 30 minutes And reevaluate.
Sat, 12/09/2026 - 06:26
#10
that’s what I’m saying. Bruh the only reason we broke up was because she was gonna transfer colleges like six states over and we both knew it wouldn’t work long-term. I mean, that was like 3 and a half years ago tho and we’re still on pretty good to this day even though she’s already got Kldz
Fri, 11/09/2026 - 23:18
#11
when you gay friend in a group chat starts randomly posting furry shit what do you do. this happend in my gc
Sat, 12/09/2026 - 08:22
#12
Ignore and move on or
if majority doesn't agree/fine with it tell him about it
Fri, 11/09/2026 - 22:55
#14
Why is Rule34 a thing? Why was the idea of creating fictional sexual affairs with nonexistent characters such an appealing and known idea that they put it in the internet rules for anons?
Sat, 12/09/2026 - 03:29
#16
Simple. People drew porn of characters and someone decided to make a site where it's easier to access and compile these artworks :V
Fri, 11/09/2026 - 22:44
#18
People always say "youve done bad things and you're going to hell" but I always wonder why people say that. Because in my eyes our rules and our morals dont apply in any celestial afterlife so why would what we have created be judged in a place where we dont rule. -anon out.
Fri, 11/09/2026 - 22:52
#19
According to the Holy Bible and the Church, God told us what not to do to achieve eternal salvation. If we go against that and don't request forgiveness or repent from it, He cannot allow us in his holy salvation. Yes I'm preaching. I have found his love and hope you all do as well
Fri, 11/09/2026 - 00:10
#22
"Life is like a dih, sometimes it's up, sometimes it's down, it's never hard forever, but no matter what, you have to beat it."
-some wise old turtle
Fri, 11/09/2026 - 16:58
#23
and no matter how hard you try to make it last, it always has to cum to a stop
Thu, 10/09/2026 - 21:52
#27
I love you all.
You might call me crazy,
say, "You don't even know me
or what I have done."
I don't. But
If people can hate
with no reason at all.
Then I don't need one
To Love.
-Modified from sign I saw
Thu, 10/09/2026 - 21:46
#29
So I put a bunch of comments in here while logged out, any anon stuff in the past couple hours is prolly me. Mb
Thu, 10/09/2026 - 20:29
#31
Look into SSPX. Great philosophical and moral debate, even if you haven't found god yet. The Church is infallible, but the people aren't.
Thu, 10/09/2026 - 21:38
#32
My follow up is: Was the Bishops' council right? Why? Who was in the most wrong? Why? Just want some opinions, and maybe you will have some ideas and info I don't.
Mon, 07/09/2026 - 20:25
#35
What constitutes sentience? If you were to map all the intricate pieces of a human brain and translate it into a computer, and this digital copy could think, say, and act things that were not programmed, is this digital copy sentient? Is sentience only delegated to the organic?
Mon, 07/09/2026 - 22:59
#36
Took me a bit too much to put my thoughts into words, but here's what I think:
To it's core, no, I do not think the digital copy would be truly sentient.
A computer can surprise us without feeling anything. True sentience requires being alive. It requires a body that knows hunger, pain, fear, and the instinct to survive. These things come from biology and evolution, not from circuits and code.
The digital copy has no body. It has never been cold, tired, or frightened. It has never had to fight to stay alive. It can talk about these things, but it cannot experience them. Without that raw, vulnerable, organic experience, it is just a clever machine producing unprogrammed outputs. That is intelligence, but it is not sentience.
I think that sentience belongs to the living because only the living know what it means to fear death.
I think that sentience belongs to the living because only the living know what it means to fear death.
Fri, 04/09/2026 - 18:13
#41
To horses, it’s play. To monkies, it’s business. But to Tom, it’s all just foolery.
Thu, 03/09/2026 - 23:41
#43
If a stone breaks with the 10th hit of a hammer,it doesn't mean that the previous 9 hits were useless
Thu, 10/09/2026 - 20:20
#44
"If ten spears go to war, and nine break, did the war forge the spear that did not break?"
-Oathbringer
Thu, 03/09/2026 - 18:54
#46
Perfection, though it may be an unattainable goal, can never be called frivolous, for it’s a goal that forces you to constantly improve
Thu, 03/09/2026 - 19:10
#47
But doesn't perfection preclude improvement?
What is perfect cannot be improved.
Unless perfection doesn't exist.
Thu, 03/09/2026 - 19:01
#49
Thu, 03/09/2026 - 19:00
#50
But does perfection even exists?
Can we really tell when something/someone is truly perfect?
Thu, 27/08/2026 - 22:26
#53
Best comment
If you're asking if fiction about incest should be treated as actual incest, or pornographic drawings should be treated as pornographic photos, then no, of course not. It's obvious.
legally speaking you actually can get arrested for drawing loli/shota porn
but you probably wont considering the president of the usa is a fucking Cannibal and a Predator
elon begging to be on the island like a good little boy is frying me💔 how many more files need to get released before we impeach the motherfucker already?